Berg v. Obama

Yesterday, I devoted my blog to the emails I received about the pending case of Berg v. Obama. Unfortunately, a part of that writing was not true. Federal Judge R. Barclay Surrick has not ruled yet on the motion for dismissal by Obama. The author of that email evidently jumped the gun by publishing that Judge Surrick had denied that motion. The facts are otherwise as there is still legal wrangling going on. This morning, 10/06/2008, Philip Berg filed a Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. Obama's legal team is trying to stop further discovery until the judge rules on their motion for dismissal.

Even though the judge has not ruled on the motion for dismissal, I corrected the blog, but left it in tact with the exception of the correction.

Like others, I think that the ruling on the dismissal motion should be made as fast as possible. A ruling in favor of Obama for dismissal would not end of the challenge; it would only prolong the inevitable. Daily, the plaintive, Philip Berg, and his team are discovering new information that bolsters their complaint that Barack Obama is not legally qualified to hold national office.

It is far better to find out now if Obama is legally qualified to be President rather than wait until after the election. It would be scandalous to have to remove a sitting President from office because he sought to fool the public about his beginnings. Such action could possibly create social unrest not seen since the civil war. This judge, by forcing the issue, could prevent such turmoil by getting all the facts before the American People. Should Barack Obama prove to be legally qualified to seek the highest office in the land, then that would be the end of it.

For his part, Obama runs the risk of looking guilty by not taking forthright action and showing proof that he meets the qualifications as laid out by the Constitution. This writer sees no point in opposing the lawsuit unless he has something to hide. Frankly, it doesn't make sense. By producing the necessary documents to prove his eligibility, he effectively muzzles those who claim that he does not qualify.

Whatever the truth about Obama, it will come out sooner or later. The difference is that later could be disastrous if Obama is not legally qualified under the Constitution.

Berg v. Obama is written about daily on these websites:

http://www.obamacrimes.com/

and

http://www.americasright.com/

If you have interest in the ongoing saga of this lawsuit, then take the time to visit these sites.
The text of the original email sent to me is still available at:

http://www.daylitesun.net/obama_email.html

That text is still available because other than the misstatements about the judge issuing a denial for dismissal, that text correctly outlines the gist of the original suit filed by Philip Berg. Faults and all, that text is compelling for those who want to know more about Barack Obama.

Cheers,

-Robert-