Emails About Obama

I want to make a correction about a ruling said to have been reached on the Obama request for dismissal. That ruling has not been made as yet but Mr. Berg is confident that the ruling will deny dismissal. I will not remove this posting but want you to be informed that the purported ruling has not been made. Go to the following link to read about it.
http://www.obamacrimes.com/
Everyday my email box fills up with supposed facts about Barack Obama. I get emails that question his loyalty, citizenship, motives, and associations. These mailings impugn Obama or his integrity without having received the necessary scrutiny for someone to take too seriously.

For months, I have discarded these missives as campaign fodder from enthusiasts who do not want Obama elected. Even though some of the emails appealed to my own biases against Obama, I still relegated them to fringe status. But this last Friday I received an email that was different from the trash that usually fills my mailbox.

Below is the first paragraph of a document written by Jon Christian Dryer on October 3, 2008 on the website NewsWithViews.com.

On September 29, 2008 US District Court Judge R. Barclay Surrick, the federal magistrate for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled in the matter of Philip J. Berg vs Barack Hussein Obama, et al as the world was distracted by the $700 billion subprime mortgage crisis. Obama sighed a breath of relief as the mainstream media chose to ignore the question: "Can Senator Barack Hussein Obama legally seek the office of President of the United States?"

(The judge denied Obama's petition for dismissal, and ordered Obama to produce the original certificate of birth along with other documents.)See correction at start of article.

When I went to the website NewswithViews.com, I found the article removed from that site. There was no mention of it on that website, but Google clearly had the article indexed and referred to that website along with the article's author, Jon Christian Dryer. Reference to the article was still on Google as of Oct 5, 2008

This is a significant event. If what the plaintiff in the lawsuit contends is correct, and Obama was born in Kenya, then at the very least, it makes Obama to be a liar. But since his mother was an American, the same might hold true for Obama. However, the story is complicated and details of a possible foreign citizenship in Malaysia may determine Obama's qualification for office.

The article makes a compelling case for Obama not being qualified to be President under Article 1 of the Constitution and gives a detailed history about the actions and travels of the then pregnant mother of Senator Obama.

The article is too long for me to present here in its entirety, but I have posted the whole thing at http://www.daylitesun.net/Obama_Email.html . Just click the link to read the complete article.

Obama's birth certificate is available on line at the following website. You can see it along side of a certified Hawaiian birth certificate. The site also details why the official birth certificate presented by Obama is probably a fake. Click on the link below to view the two birth certificates.

http://www.hawaiitopia.com/?p=36

You can read about the Judge's ruling denying dismissal of the lawsuit here:

texashillblog.wordpress.com

Associations are like a fingerprint. Whether or not a person intends it, our associations help form our outlook and ideas. For instance, if you are a Dallas Cowboy fan that moves to Houston, all of a sudden you will have new associates who love and talk about the Houston Texans. Although you may retain your original loyalties to the Cowboys, you will become sympathetic to the Texans. So, association with Texan fans injects you with a new outlook and a secondary loyalty. The same holds true with your everyday associations. A little of your associates philosophy and their concerns will become intertwined with your own ideas.

This happens because our brains develop logical pathways using the ideas of an associate that we instinctively find acceptable. The Patty Hearst case is another example of accepting foreign ideas when exposed to them on a daily basis. This is a survival instinct hard wired to humans. Do not let anybody tell you that your associations don't matter. They do matter because they help form your ideas and outlook in life.

Once a person takes a closer look at Obama and the associates that he has cultivated, it brings up the question about his philosophical grounding. Among the more serious emails that come into my box, I get this one. This email does not falsely make any statements that I have been able to find, and the questions and conclusions asked are cogent to this subject. The following is an excerpt from that email.

Around 1979 Obama started college at Occidental in California. He is very open about his two years at Occidental, he tried all kinds of drugs and was wasting his time but, even though he had a brilliant mind, did not apply himself to his studies. 'Barry' (that was the name he used all his life) during this time had two roommates, Muhammad Hasan Chandoo and Wahid Hamid, both from Pakistan. During the summer of 1981, after his second year in college, he made a 'round the world' trip. Stopping to see his mother in Indonesia, next Hyderabad in India, three weeks in Karachi, Pakistan where he stayed with his roommate's family, then off to Africa to visit his father's family. My question, - "Where did he get the money for this trip?" Neither I, nor any one of my children would have had money for a trip like this when they were in college. When he came back he started school at Columbia University in New York. It is at this time he wants everyone to call him Barack - not Barry. "Do you know what the tuition is at Columbia?" It's not cheap to say the least!" Where did he get money for tuition?" "Student Loans?" Maybe. After Columbia, he went to Chicago to work as a Community Organizer for $12,000 a year." Why Chicago?" " Why not New York?" He was already living in New York.

By 'chance' he met Antoin 'Tony' Rezko, born in Aleppo Syria, and a real estate developer in Chicago. Rezko has been convicted of fraud and bribery this year. Rezko, was named 'Entrepreneur of the Decade' by the Arab-American Business and Professional Association'.

About two years later, Obama entered Harvard Law School. "Do you have any idea what tuition is for Harvard Law School?"" Where did he get the money for Law School?"" More student loans?" After Law school, he went back to Chicago. Rezko offered him a job, which he turned down. But, he did take a job with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland. Guess what? They represented 'Rezar' which is Rezko's firm. Rezko was one of Obama's first major financial contributors when he ran for office in Chicago. In 2003, Rezko threw an early fundraiser for Obama which Chicago Tribune reporter David Mendelland claims was instrumental in providing Obama with 'seed money' for his U.S. Senate race. In 2005, Obama purchased a new home in the Kenwoood District of Chicago for $1.65 million (less than the asking price). With ALL those Student Loans - Where did he get the money for the property? On the same day, Rezko's wife, Rita, purchased the adjoining empty lot for full price. The London Times reported that Nadhmi Auchi, an Iraqi-born Billionaire loaned Rezko $3.5 million three weeks before Obama's new home was purchased. Obama met Nadhmi Auchi many times with Rezko.

My conclusion in the whole Obama debacle is that the man is not what he claims to be. In every instance of Obama's life, his patrons have all been Muslims. His associations plague him. Everybody has known a person or two that they would rather forget, but Obama has cultivated those type of friends all of his student and adult life. Does any reasonable person believe that Obama will disassociate himself from those who financed and guided him throughout his career? Obama did not spend his formative years in America, and as a result, he has a skewed image of this country. Literally, Obama is missing what most people raised in this country have, and that is a deep and instinctive loyalty to America.

Obama never speaks of the greatness of this country, or has anything good to say about it. He does speak of changing the country into what HIS opinion of a good country should be. God help us if we elect this man. Democrats, what were you thinking when you nominated Obama? It is clear that Democrats did not vet this man. And because the Democrats failed to thoroughly investigate his qualifications for president, it could irrevocably hurt the Democratic Party.

The Democratic Party's negligence is also hurtful to all of those people who believed in and sent money to his campaign. How can these people ever recoup the hundreds of millions of dollars they have spent in the effort to elect a candidate who, by law, may not be qualified to be President? This is a serious matter with broad implications for the Democratic Party.

Cheers,

-Robert-